Recommendations for Improving Methods and Models for Aquatic Hazard Assessment of Ionizable Organic Chemicals

50Citations
Citations of this article
73Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ionizable organic chemicals (IOCs) such as organic acids and bases are an important substance class requiring aquatic hazard evaluation. Although the aquatic toxicity of IOCs is highly dependent on the water pH, many toxicity studies in the literature cannot be interpreted because pH was not reported or not kept constant during the experiment, calling for an adaptation and improvement of testing guidelines. The modulating influence of pH on toxicity is mainly caused by pH-dependent uptake and bioaccumulation of IOCs, which can be described by ion-trapping and toxicokinetic models. The internal effect concentrations of IOCs were found to be independent of the external pH because of organisms’ and cells’ ability to maintain a stable internal pH milieu. If the external pH is close to the internal pH, existing quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) for neutral organics can be adapted by substituting the octanol–water partition coefficient by the ionization-corrected liposome–water distribution ratio as the hydrophobicity descriptor, demonstrated by modification of the target lipid model. Charged, zwitterionic and neutral species of an IOC can all contribute to observed toxicity, either through concentration-additive mixture effects or by interaction of different species, as is the case for uncoupling of mitochondrial respiration. For specifically acting IOCs, we recommend a 2-step screening procedure with ion-trapping/QSAR models used to predict the baseline toxicity, followed by adjustment using the toxic ratio derived from in vitro systems. Receptor- or plasma-binding models also show promise for elucidating IOC toxicity. The present review is intended to help demystify the ecotoxicity of IOCs and provide recommendations for their hazard and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2020;39:269–286. © 2019 The Authors. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC.

References Powered by Scopus

Enhancing Ecotoxicological Modeling and Assessment

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: The toxcast project

517Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modes of action in ecotoxicology: Their role in body burdens, species sensitivity, QSARs, and mixture effects

446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the Science and a Proposed Path Forward

240Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Zebrafish embryos and larvae as alternative animal models for toxicity testing

84Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cytotoxicity burst? Differentiating specific from nonspecific effects in tox21 in vitro reporter gene assays

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Escher, B. I., Abagyan, R., Embry, M., Klüver, N., Redman, A. D., Zarfl, C., & Parkerton, T. F. (2020, February 1). Recommendations for Improving Methods and Models for Aquatic Hazard Assessment of Ionizable Organic Chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4602

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

55%

Researcher 14

37%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 16

55%

Chemistry 6

21%

Engineering 4

14%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free