The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective

363Citations
Citations of this article
208Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The prevalence of nonmarital cohabitation is steadily increasing in the United States. In evaluating the contribution of this new living arrangement to family formation, analysts have relied primarily on comparisons between individuals who cohabit and those who do not. We complement this line of inquiry by comparing the United States and 16 industrialized nations. We first identify six conceptually distinct ideal types of cohabitation with respect to family formation. We then propose empirical indicators to distinguish between the different ideal types, and estimate the values of these indicators for each of the 17 nations. Our findings indicate that although a number of countries fit an empirical pattern corresponding to one ideal type, cohabitation in the United States is more difficult to characterize.

References Powered by Scopus

Family Ties in Western Europe: Persistent Contrasts

902Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States

831Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications

516Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review

1088Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives

747Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Family structure and the reproduction of inequalities

644Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(5), 1214–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 124

74%

Researcher 21

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 20

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 133

81%

Psychology 20

12%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6

4%

Arts and Humanities 5

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0