Estimated date of delivery based on second trimester fetal head circumference: A population-based validation of 21 451 deliveries

2Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Fetal biometry is used for determining gestational age and estimated date of delivery (EDD). However, the accuracy of the EDD depends on the assumed length of pregnancy included in the calculation. This study aimed at assessing the actual pregnancy length and accuracy of EDD prediction based on fetal head circumference measured at the second trimester. Material and methods: This was a population-based observational study with the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, head circumference dating in the second trimester, spontaneous onset or induction of delivery ≥ 294 days of gestation, live birth. The EDD was set anticipating a pregnancy length of 282 days. Bias in the prediction of EDD was defined as the difference between the actual date of birth and the EDD. Results: Head circumference measurements were available for 21 451 pregnancies. Ultrasound-dated pregnancies had a median pregnancy length of 283.03 days, corresponding to a method bias of 1.03 days (95% CI; 0.89-1.16). This bias was dependent on the head circumference at dating, ranging from −1.58 days (95% CI; −3.54 to 1.12) to 3.42 days (95% CI; 1.98-4.31). The median pregnancy length, based on the last menstrual period of women with a regular menstrual cycle (n = 12 985), was 283.15 days (95% CI; 282.91-283.31). A total of 5685 (22.9%, 95% CI; 22.4% to 23.4%) and 886 women (3.6%, 95% CI; 3.3%-3.8%) were still pregnant 7 and 14 days after the EDD, respectively. Conclusions: Second trimester head circumference measurements can be safely used to predict EDD. A revision of the pregnancy length to 283 days will reduce the bias of EDD prediction to a level comparable with other methods.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Estimated date of delivery with electronic medical records by a hybrid GBDT-GRU model

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of Fetal Head Circumference (HC) and Biparietal Diameter (BPD (Biparietal Diameter)) in Ultrasound Images Using Multi-Task Deep Convolutional Neural Network

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kessler, J., Johnsen, S. L., Ebbing, C., Karlsen, H. O., Rasmussen, S., & Kiserud, T. (2019). Estimated date of delivery based on second trimester fetal head circumference: A population-based validation of 21 451 deliveries. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 98(1), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13454

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Researcher 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 6

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

43%

Computer Science 1

7%

Physics and Astronomy 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free