Exploring the potential and limits of a neuroscientific approach to entrepreneurship

17Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We critically examine the potential that neuroscience holds for the future of entrepreneurship research and provide a framework for entrepreneurship researchers interested in pursuing this line of inquiry. Specifically, we propose four complementary mechanisms through which neuroscience can inform entrepreneurship theory and research. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations and ethical implications of a neuroscientific approach to entrepreneurship.

References Powered by Scopus

Emotion circuits in the brain

6699Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience

5152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: Etymology and strategic intentions

4661Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Artificial intelligence as an enabler for entrepreneurs: a systematic literature review and an agenda for future research

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs

40Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Micro-foundations of strategic decision-making in family business organisations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicolaou, N., Lockett, A., Ucbasaran, D., & Rees, G. (2019). Exploring the potential and limits of a neuroscientific approach to entrepreneurship. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 37(6), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242619843234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

47%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

17%

Researcher 8

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 32

74%

Social Sciences 5

12%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4

9%

Computer Science 2

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 268

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free