Evaluating recommender system stability with influence-guided fuzzing

7Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recommender systems help users to find products or services they may like when lacking personal experience or facing an overwhelming set of choices. Since unstable recommendations can lead to distrust, loss of profits, and a poor user experience, it is important to test recommender system stability. In this work, we present an approach based on inferred models of influence that underlie recommender systems to guide the generation of dataset modifications to assess a recommender's stability. We implement our approach and evaluate it on several recommender algorithms using the MovieLens dataset. We find that influence-guided fuzzing can effectively find small sets of modifications that cause significantly more instability than random approaches.

References Powered by Scopus

Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms

7501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems

4644Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews

4252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Denoising Implicit Feedback for Recommendation

175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic modeling of user preferences for stable recommendations

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generating a new shilling attack for recommendation systems

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shriver, D., Elbaum, S., Dwyer, M. B., & Rosenblum, D. S. (2019). Evaluating recommender system stability with influence-guided fuzzing. In 33rd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2019, 31st Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, IAAI 2019 and the 9th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence, EAAI 2019 (pp. 4934–4942). AAAI Press. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33014934

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

94%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 15

83%

Social Sciences 1

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

6%

Mathematics 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free