Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel Β-sheets

166Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The factors that determine the stability of antiparallel β-sheets are considered via a theoretical analysis of conformational free energies. A series of idealized model polyalanine β-sheets are built with constraints such that the angular geometry of hydrogen bonding varies in the range observed in proteins while hydrogen bonding distance remains fixed. The conformations of the sheets generated in this way have a broad distribution of twist angles ranging from highly twisted left-handed to highly twisted right-handed orientations. The association free energies of the sheets are calculated with a gas phase CHARMM potential and FDPB/γ solvation models. Left-handed structures are found to be less stable than right handed structures due to intrachain steric hindrance in isolated left-handed strands. This explains why antiparallel β-sheets in proteins are invariably twisted in the right-handed direction. The free energy surface for right-handed sheets shows particular preference for conformations ranging from flat to those that exhibit a pronounced right-handed twist. This suggests that antiparallel β-sheets can adopt a variety of right-handed conformations, a result that is consistent with observations on known proteins. In parallel with our study of a-helices we find that van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions are the primary factor stabilizing polyalanine β-sheets, while electrostatic interactions including hydrogen bonding are found to be destabilizing. However, in contrast to helices, the net change in conformational free energy involving only backbone-backbone interactions (including β-carbons) is not sufficient to overcome the loss in configurational entropy that accompanies sheet formation. Rather we suggest that cross-strand non-polar side-chain-side-chain interactions are essential for sheet formation, explaining why large non-polar amino acids have the greatest sheet forming propensities. Thus, sheet propensities involve pairwise interactions and are expected to be context dependent, as has been observed in recent experiments. © 1995 Academic Press Limited.

References Powered by Scopus

The Anatomy and Taxonomy of Protein Structure

3193Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Hydrogen bonding in globular proteins

1718Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A new approach to protein fold recognition

1093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Generalized born models of macromolecular solvation effects

1025Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tryptophan zippers: Stable, monomeric β-hairpins

668Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Electrostatic aspects of protein-protein interactions

660Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, A. S., & Honig, B. (1995). Free energy determinants of secondary structure formation: II. Antiparallel Β-sheets. Journal of Molecular Biology, 252(3), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1995.0503

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

51%

Researcher 25

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Chemistry 34

47%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18

25%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

17%

Physics and Astronomy 8

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0