Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs

35Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Orientation for optimal systolic performance of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valves was defined in previous studies. The present study investigates the influence of valve orientation on coronary artery flow in an animal model. Methods: A rotation device holding either a Medtronic Hall tilting disc (n = 4; Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, Minn), a St Jude Medical bileaflet (n = 4; St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, Minn), or a Medtronic Advantage bileaflet (n = 3) aortic valve was implanted. The device allowed rotation of the valve without reopening the aorta. Flow through the left anterior descending coronary artery was measured preoperatively and at normal versus high cardiac output after weaning from extracorporeal circulation. Measurements were performed at the best and worst hemodynamic position, as defined previously. Results: Coronary flow rates were similar in all animals preoperatively (26 ± 4.1 mL/min). After aortic valve replacement, left anterior descending flow increased significantly to 58.2 ± 10.6 mL/min. Highest flow rates at normal cardiac output were found in the optimum orientation, especially for the Medtronic valves (Medtronic Hall, 64 ± 8.7 mL/min; Medtronic Advantage, 64.6 ± 11.6 mL/min; St Jude Medical, 48.3 ± 10.3 mL/min), whereas the worst position demonstrated significantly lower left anterior descending flow, with no differences among valves (Medtronic Hall, 37.5 ± 1.3 mL/min; St Jude Medical, 35.7 ± 10.7 mL/min; Medtronic Advantage, 39.8 ± mL/min). Left anterior descending artery flow increased significantly with higher cardiac output. Conclusions: Coronary blood flow was significantly influenced by mechanical aortic valve implantation and the orientation of prostheses. For both valve designs, the previously defined optimum orientation with respect to pressure gradients and turbulence demonstrated the highest left anterior descending flow rates. Even in its optimum orientation, the St Jude Medical valve showed significantly lower coronary flow than the other valves.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of aortic heart valve prostheses

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coronary flow reserve improves after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: An adenosine transthoracic echocardiography study

113Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Commissural Alignment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve and Native Aortic Valve Following Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and its Impact on Valvular Function and Coronary Filling

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch and Aortic Valve Design on Coronary Flow Reserve After Aortic Valve Replacement

68Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of implantation orientation of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve on kinematics and hemodynamics in an anatomic aorta

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kleine, P., Scherer, M., Abdel-Rahman, U., Klesius, A. A., Ackermann, H., & Moritz, A. (2002). Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: Comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 124(5), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2002.126046

Readers over time

‘10‘12‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

62%

Researcher 7

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

50%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Materials Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0