Online learning of interpretable word embeddings

51Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Word embeddings encode semantic meanings of words into low-dimension word vectors. In most word embeddings, one cannot interpret the meanings of specific dimensions of those word vectors. Nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) has been proposed to learn interpretable word embeddings via non-negative constraints. However, NMF methods suffer from scale and memory issue because they have to maintain a global matrix for learning. To alleviate this challenge, we propose online learning of interpretable word embeddings from streaming text data. Experiments show that our model consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art word embedding methods in both representation ability and interpretability. The source code of this paper can be obtained from http://github.com/skTim/OIWE.

References Powered by Scopus

GloVe: Global vectors for word representation

26934Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization

11186Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Projected gradient methods for nonnegative matrix factorization

1389Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Knowledge representation learning: A review

179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How behavioural sciences can promote truth, autonomy and democratic discourse online

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Improving knowledge graph embedding using simple constraints

93Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, H., Luan, Z., Huanbo, L., & Sun, M. (2015). Online learning of interpretable word embeddings. In Conference Proceedings - EMNLP 2015: Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 1687–1692). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d15-1196

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 67

66%

Researcher 28

27%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

4%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 93

87%

Linguistics 7

7%

Engineering 4

4%

Social Sciences 3

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free