Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past?

342Citations
Citations of this article
1.4kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Siemens and Downes initially received increasing attention in the blogosphere in 2005 when they discussed their ideas concerning distributed knowledge. An extended discourse has ensued in and around the status of 'connectivism' as a learning theory for the digital age. This has led to a number of questions in relation to existing learning theories. Do they still meet the needs of today's learners, and anticipate the needs of learners of the future? Would a new theory that encompasses new developments in digital technology be more appropriate, and would it be suitable for other aspects of learning, including in the traditional class room, in distance education and e-learning? This paper will highlight current theories of learning and critically analyse connectivism within the context of its predecessors, to establish if it has anything new to offer as a learning theory or as an approach to teaching for the 21st Century.

References Powered by Scopus

Blogs and wikis as disruptive technologies: Is it time for a new pedagogy?

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Students' and instructors' use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges

735Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Three generations of distance education pedagogy

561Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The challenges to connectivist learning on open online networks: Learning experiences during a massive open online course

440Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. Athabasca University. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i3.523

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 716

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 121

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 97

10%

Researcher 77

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 486

61%

Computer Science 128

16%

Arts and Humanities 104

13%

Business, Management and Accounting 76

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free