Heterogeneous structure of stem cells dynamics: Statistical models and quantitative predictions

25Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding stem cell (SC) population dynamics is essential for developing models that can be used in basic science and medicine, to aid in predicting cells fate. These models can be used as tools e.g. in studying patho-physiological events at the cellular and tissue level, predicting (mal)functions along the developmental course, and personalized regenerative medicine. Using time-lapsed imaging and statistical tools, we show that the dynamics of SC populations involve a heterogeneous structure consisting of multiple sub-population behaviors. Using non-Gaussian statistical approaches, we identify the co-existence of fast and slow dividing subpopulations, and quiescent cells, in stem cells from three species. The mathematical analysis also shows that, instead of developing independently, SCs exhibit a time-dependent fractal behavior as they interact with each other through molecular and tactile signals. These findings suggest that more sophisticated models of SC dynamics should view SC populations as a collective and avoid the simplifying homogeneity assumption by accounting for the presence of more than one dividing sub-population, and their multi-fractal characteristics.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Mesenchymal stem cells

3820Citations
2093Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Get full text

Re-Thinking EEG-Based Non-Invasive Brain Interfaces: Modeling and Analysis

41Citations
51Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bogdan, P., Deasy, B. M., Gharaibeh, B., Roehrs, T., & Marculescu, R. (2014). Heterogeneous structure of stem cells dynamics: Statistical models and quantitative predictions. Scientific Reports, 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04826

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2305101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 39

63%

Researcher 14

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23

48%

Engineering 12

25%

Physics and Astronomy 8

17%

Computer Science 5

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0