Comparative study of MRI biomarkers in the substantia nigra to discriminate idiopathic Parkinson disease

70Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several new MR imaging techniques have shown promising results in patients with Parkinson disease; however, the comparative diagnostic values of these measures at the individual level remain unclear. Our aim was to compare the diagnostic value of MR imaging biomarkers of substantia nigra damage for distinguishing patients with Parkinson disease from healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients and 20 healthy volunteers were prospectively included. The MR imaging protocol at 3T included 3D T2-weighted and T1-weighted neuromelanin-sensitive images, diffusion tensor images, and R2* mapping. T2* high-resolution images were also acquired at 7T to evaluate the dorsal nigral hyperintensity sign. Quantitative analysis was performed using ROIs in the substantia nigra drawn manually around the area of high signal intensity on neuromelanin-sensitive images and T2-weighted images. Visual analysis of the substantia nigra neuromelanin-sensitive signal intensity and the dorsolateral nigral hyperintensity on T2* images was performed. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the neuromelanin-sensitive volume and signal intensity in patients with Parkinson disease. There was also a significant decrease in fractional anisotropy and an increase in mean, axial, and radial diffusivity in the neuromelanin-sensitive substantia nigra at 3T and a decrease in substantia nigra volume on T2* images. The combination of substantia nigra volume, signal intensity, and fractional anisotropy in the neuromelanin-sensitive substantia nigra allowed excellent diagnostic accuracy (0.93). Visual assessment of both substantia nigra dorsolateral hyperintensity and neuromelanin-sensitive images had good diagnostic accuracy (0.91 and 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of neuromelanin signal and volume changes with fractional anisotropy measurements in the substantia nigra showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, the high diagnostic accuracy of visual assessment of substantia nigra changes using dorsolateral hyperintensity analysis or neuromelanin-sensitive signal changes indicates that these techniques are promising for clinical practice.

Figures

  • FIG 1. Segmentation of ROIs. Axial brain stem slices in a healthy volunteer (A) and a patient with Parkinson disease (B) show reduction of the neuromelanin signal intensity in the substantia nigra of the patient. Axial T2*WI 7T slices show dorsal nigral hyperintensity in a HV (C), which is absent in the patient with PD (D). T2WI axial (E) and coronal (F) images of the SN in a HV show T2-based segmentation of the SN.
  • Table 1: Quantitative measurements in the SNa
  • FIG 2. Boxplot of the 3T NM SN volume (cubic millimeters) (A) and signal intensity ratio (B) (calculated by normalizing the mean signal of the SN in each slice to the signal in the background region), the 3T NM FA (C), and the 7T T2*WI SN volume (D) shows a reduction in all measures in patients with PD compared with HVs.
  • FIG 3. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the 3T NM volume, the 3T NM signal intensity ratio, the 3T NM FA, the 7T T2* volume (A), and the combination of the first 3 biomarkers for differentiating patients with PD from HVs (B).
  • Table 2: Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative and qualitative (visual) assessments

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pyatigorskaya, N., Magnin, B., Mongin, M., Yahia-Cherif, L., Valabregue, R., Arnaldi, D., … Lehéricy, X. S. (2018). Comparative study of MRI biomarkers in the substantia nigra to discriminate idiopathic Parkinson disease. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 39(8), 1460–1467. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5702

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

53%

Researcher 18

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

44%

Neuroscience 15

28%

Engineering 12

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0