Potential applications and performance of machine learning techniques and algorithms in clinical practice: A systematic review

65Citations
Citations of this article
148Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The advent of clinically adapted machine learning algorithms can solve numerous problems ranging from disease diagnosis and prognosis to therapy recommendations. This systematic review examines the performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms and evaluates the progress made to date towards their implementation in clinical practice. Methods: Systematic searching of databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and WHO Covid-19 database) to identify original articles published between January 2011 and October 2021. Studies reporting ML techniques in clinical practice involving humans and ML algorithms with a performance metric were considered. Results: Of 873 unique articles identified, 36 studies were eligible for inclusion. The XGBoost (extreme gradient boosting) algorithm showed the highest potential for clinical applications (n = 7 studies); this was followed jointly by random forest algorithm, logistic regression, and the support vector machine, respectively (n = 5 studies). Prediction of outcomes (n = 33), in particular Inflammatory diseases (n = 7) received the most attention followed by cancer and neuropsychiatric disorders (n = 5 for each) and Covid-19 (n = 4). Thirty-three out of the thirty-six included studies passed more than 50% of the selected quality assessment criteria in the TRIPOD checklist. In contrast, none of the studies could achieve an ideal overall bias rating of ‘low’ based on the PROBAST checklist. In contrast, only three studies showed evidence of the deployment of ML algorithm(s) in clinical practice. Conclusions: ML is potentially a reliable tool for clinical decision support. Although advocated widely in clinical practice, work is still in progress to validate clinically adapted ML algorithms. Improving quality standards, transparency, and interpretability of ML models will further lower the barriers to acceptability.

Figures

References Powered by Scopus

Machine learning in medicine

2060Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PROBAST: A tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies

1430Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Big data and machine learning algorithms for health-care delivery

928Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A machine learning-based risk stratification tool for in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients with heart failure

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does AI explainability affect physicians’ intention to use AI?

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantification of the antagonistic and synergistic effects of Pb<sup>2+</sup>, Cu<sup>2+</sup>, and Zn<sup>2+</sup> bioaccumulation by living Bacillus subtilis biomass using XGBoost and SHAP

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nwanosike, E. M., Conway, B. R., Merchant, H. A., & Hasan, S. S. (2022). Potential applications and performance of machine learning techniques and algorithms in clinical practice: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104679

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

48%

Researcher 11

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 9

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 18

42%

Computer Science 16

37%

Engineering 5

12%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0