Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems

78Citations
Citations of this article
225Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) screening methods are an effective means for the detection of protein-protein interactions. Optimisation and automation has increased the throughput of the method to an extent that allows the systematic mapping of protein-protein interactions on a proteome-wide scale. Since two-hybrid screens fail to detect a great number of interactions, parallel high-throughput approaches are needed for proteome-wide interaction screens. In this review, we discuss and compare different approaches for adaptation of Y2H screening to high-throughput, the limits of the method and possible alternative approaches to complement the mapping of organism-wide protein-protein interactions.

References Powered by Scopus

A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions

5150Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes

4095Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A comprehensive analysis of protein-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

4003Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identification of factors required for m<sup>6</sup>A mRNA methylation in Arabidopsis reveals a role for the conserved E3 ubiquitin ligase HAKAI

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diversity in genetic in vivo methods for protein-protein interaction studies: From the yeast two-hybrid system to the mammalian split-luciferase system

158Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peptide aptamers: Development and applications

144Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koegl, M., & Uetz, P. (2007, December). Improving yeast two-hybrid screening systems. Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elm035

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 97

68%

Researcher 29

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 14

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 97

59%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 54

33%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

4%

Chemistry 6

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 6
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0