A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli

2.3kCitations
Citations of this article
965Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Part 1 of this discussion summarizes several formal models of exicitatory classical conditioning. It is suggested that a central problem for all of them is the explanation of cases in which learning does not occur in spite of the fact that the CS is a signal for the reinforcer. A new model is proposed that deals with this problem by specifying that certain procedures cause a CS to lose effectiveness; in particular, it is argued that a CS will lose associability when its consequences are accurately predicted. In contrast to other current models, the effectiveness of the reinforcer remains constant throughout conditioning. Part 2 presents a reformulation of the nature of the learning produced by inhibitory-conditioning procedures and a discussion of the way in which such learning can be accommodated within the model outlined for excitatory learning. (47 ref) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved). © 1980 American Psychological Association.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons

3470Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Getting formal with dopamine and reward

1992Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Emotion and motivation: The role of the amygdala, ventral striatum, and prefrontal cortex

1758Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pearce, J. M., & Hall, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87(6), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.532

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 421

61%

Researcher 170

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 79

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 25

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 366

53%

Neuroscience 165

24%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130

19%

Computer Science 30

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 4
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free