SUD or Surface-Syntactic Universal Dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD

67Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article proposes a surface-syntactic annotation scheme called SUD that is near-isomorphic to the Universal Dependencies (UD) annotation scheme while following distributional criteria for defining the dependency tree structure and the naming of the syntactic functions. Rule-based graph transformation grammars allow for a bi-directional transformation of UD into SUD. The back-and-forth transformation can serve as an error-mining tool to assure the intralanguage and inter-language coherence of the UD treebanks.

References Powered by Scopus

Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages

249Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Application of Graph Rewriting to Natural Language Processing

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Universal dependencies

397Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dependency locality as an explanatory principle for word order

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The status of function words in dependency Grammar: A critique of Universal Dependencies (UD)

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gerdes, K., Guillaume, B., Kahane, S., & Perrier, G. (2018). SUD or Surface-Syntactic Universal Dependencies: An annotation scheme near-isomorphic to UD. In EMNLP 2018 - 2nd Workshop on Universal Dependencies, UDW 2018 - Proceedings of the Workshop (pp. 66–74). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-6008

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

63%

Researcher 7

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 19

58%

Linguistics 10

30%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Engineering 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0