Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator

10Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study reports on an evaluation of the ability of a cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) and the integral MNC computer software program to collect a variety of MNC subsets. The collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus for these MNC subsets was compared to that of another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter). The collected MNCs were also assayed ex vivo to determine if these cells remained functional. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy volunteer blood donors were recruited to provide PBMNCs for the isolation of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, NK, and γδ+ cells and monocytes. Cells were collected with an Amicus (test arm; n = 16) or a CS-3000 plus (control arm; n = 11) cell seParator. Cells were counted on a flow cytometer and CEs were calculated. For functional studies, the Amicus-collected MNC data were compared to CS-3000 Plus historical data. Functional studies performed included surface antigen expression assays (CD8+), proliferation assays (CD4+ and CD8+ cells), NK cytotoxicity assays for K562 and HUVE cells, and E-selectin induction on endothelial cells through NK+ contact dependency. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from CD34+ cells collected on the Amicus, positively selected by the use of antibody-bound, magnetic bead technology, and then cultured ex vivo with a combination of growth factors to generate the DCs. RESULTS: CEs were higher on the Amicus than on the CS-3000 Plus for CD3+ (68 vs. 54%), CD4+ (70 vs. 56%), CD8+ (68 vs. 52%), and CD19+ (60 vs. 48%) cells (p<0.05). For the two separators, CEs were equivalent for monocytes, NK+, and γδ+ cells. The Amicus separator, collected significantly fewer platelets than did the CS-3000 Plus (p<0.00001). CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells proliferated normally. NK cells appropriately stimulated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells. Culture-generated DCs obtained by using Amicus-collected CD34+ cells expressed appropriate cell surface markers. CONCLUSION: The Amicus separator is acceptable for the collection of PBMNC subsets. The device collects CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ T- and B-cell subsets with greater efficiency and collects MNCs with significantly fewer contaminating platelets than does the CS-3000 Plus. Cells collected on the Amicus are suitable for use in a variety of research and clinical immunobiologic studies.

References Powered by Scopus

Dendritic cells and the control of immunity

12707Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Determination of lymphocyte division by flow cytometry

1512Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

'Panning' for lymphocytes: A method for cell selection

1252Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: Consensus guidelines and recommendations

342Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Optimization of Leukocyte Collection and Monocyte Isolation for Dendritic Cell Culture

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collection of peripheral progenitor cells: A comparison between Amicus and Cobe-Spectra blood cell separators

23Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Snyder, E. L., O’Donnell, L., Dengler, T. J., Pomper, G. J., Velleca, M. A., Dincecco, D. M., … Bender, J. R. (2001). Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator. Transfusion, 41(7), 940–949. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41070940.x

Readers over time

‘12‘16‘19‘20‘2200.250.50.751

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Immunology and Microbiology 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0