Lost in translation? Comparing the effectiveness of electronic-based and paper-based cognitive AIDS

S. D. Marshall

ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Lost in translation? Comparing the effectiveness of electronic-based and paper-based cognitive AIDS

Marshall S

British Journal of Anaesthesia

DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex263

11Citations

21Readers

References Powered by Scopus

View more at Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

View more at Scopus

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marshall, S. D. (2017, November 1). Lost in translation? Comparing the effectiveness of electronic-based and paper-based cognitive AIDS. British Journal of Anaesthesia. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex263

Readers over time

Readers' Seniority

Researcher 6

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

31%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

Readers' Discipline

Medicine and Dentistry 6

50%

Computer Science 2

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

17%

Psychology 2

17%

Lost in translation? Comparing the effectiveness of electronic-based and paper-based cognitive AIDS

References Powered by Scopus

The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: A review of the literature

The Vortex: A universal 'high-acuity implementation tool' for emergency airway management

Implementing emergency manuals: Can cognitive aids help translate best practices for patient care during acute events?

Cited by Powered by Scopus

‘Read-and-do’ response to a digital cognitive aid in simulated cardiac arrest: the Medical Assistance eXpert 2 randomised controlled trial

ABCDE cognitive aid tool in patient assessment – development and validation in a multicenter pilot simulation study

Role of the Difficult Airway Society in improving airway management

Register to see more suggestions

Cite

Readers over time

Readers' Seniority

Readers' Discipline