Island biogeography of the Mediterranean sea: The species-area relationship for terrestrial isopods

79Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: We looked at the biogeographical patterns of Oniscidean fauna from the small islands of the Mediterranean Sea in order to investigate the species-area relationship and to test for area-range effectsq1. Location: The Mediterranean Sea. Methods: We compiled from the literature a data set of 176 species of Oniscidea (terrestrial isopods) distributed over 124 Mediterranean islands. Jaccard's index was used as input for a UPGMA cluster analysis. The species-area relationship was investigated by applying linear, semi-logarithmic, logarithmic and sigmoid models. We also investigated a possible 'small island effect' (SIE) by performing breakpoint regression. We used a cumulative and a sliding-window approach to evaluate scale-dependent area-range effects on the log S/log A regression parameters. Results: Based on similarity indexes, results indicated that small islands of the Mediterranean Sea can be divided into two major groups: eastern and western. In general, islands from eastern archipelagos were linked together at similarity values higher than those observed for western Mediterranean islands. This is consistent with a more even distribution of species in the eastern Mediterranean islands. Separate archipelagos in the western Mediterranean could be discriminated, with the exception of islets, which tended to group together at the lowest similarity values regardless of the archipelago to which they belong. Islets were characterized by a few common species with large ranges. The species-area logarithmic model did not always provide the best fit. Most continental archipelagos showed very similar intercepts, higher than the intercept for the Canary island oceanic archipelago. Sigmoid regression returned convex curves. Evidence for a SIE was found, whereas area-range effects that are dependent on larger scale analyses were not unambiguously supportedq2. Main conclusions: The Oniscidea fauna from small islands of the Mediterranean Sea is highly structured, with major and minor geographical patterns being identifiable. Some but not all of the biogeographical complexity can be explained by interpreting the different shapes of species-area curves. Despite its flexibility, the sigmoid model tested did not always provide the best fit. Moreover, when the model did provide a good fit the curves looked convex, not sigmoid. We found evidence for a SIE, and minor support for scale-dependent area-range effects. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Ecology's most general, yet protean pattern: The species-area relationship

603Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shapes and functions of species-area curves: A review of possible models

350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a more general species-area relationship: Diversity on all islands, great and small

292Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Which function describes the species-area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation

309Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Re-approaching the small island effect

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patterns of species richness on very small islands: The plants of the Aegean archipelago

106Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gentile, G., & Argano, R. (2005). Island biogeography of the Mediterranean sea: The species-area relationship for terrestrial isopods. Journal of Biogeography, 32(10), 1715–1726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01329.x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 43

43%

Researcher 30

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 22

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69

70%

Environmental Science 25

26%

Social Sciences 2

2%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free