Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice

250Citations
Citations of this article
574Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Several studies have illustrated that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) can elicit therapeutic effects that are similar to those produced by its invasive counterpart, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). VNS is an FDA-approved therapy for the treatment of both depression and epilepsy, but it is limited to the management of more severe, intervention-resistant cases as a second or third-line treatment option due to perioperative risks involved with device implantation. In contrast, tVNS is a non-invasive technique that involves the application of electrical currents through surface electrodes at select locations, most commonly targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and the cervical branch of the vagus nerve in the neck. Although it has been shown that tVNS elicits hypo- and hyperactivation in various regions of the brain associated with anxiety and mood regulation, the mechanism of action and influence of stimulation parameters on clinical outcomes remains predominantly hypothetical. Suppositions are largely based on correlations between the neurobiology of the vagus nerve and its effects on neural activity. However, tVNS has also been investigated for several other disorders, including tinnitus, migraine and pain, by targeting the vagus nerve at sites in both the ear and the neck. As most of the described methods differ in the parameters and protocols applied, there is currently no firm evidence on the optimal location for tVNS or the stimulation parameters that provide the greatest therapeutic effects for a specific condition. This review presents the current status of tVNS with a focus on stimulation parameters, stimulation sites, and available devices. For tVNS to reach its full potential as a non-invasive and clinically relevant therapy, it is imperative that systematic studies be undertaken to reveal the mechanism of action and optimal stimulation modalities.

References Powered by Scopus

Early identification of refractory epilepsy

4261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Limbic-cortical dysregulation: A proposed model of depression

1331Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: Serial changes and relationship to clinical response

970Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial

253Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in humans induces pupil dilation and attenuates alpha oscillations

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation affect vagally mediated heart rate variability? A living and interactive Bayesian meta-analysis

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yap, J. Y. Y., Keatch, C., Lambert, E., Woods, W., Stoddart, P. R., & Kameneva, T. (2020, April 28). Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice. Frontiers in Neuroscience. Frontiers Media S.A. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00284

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 140

58%

Researcher 53

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 37

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 13

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 77

36%

Neuroscience 68

31%

Engineering 41

19%

Psychology 30

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 5
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 268

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free