Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology

37Citations
Citations of this article
226Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The main purpose of the paper is to present the rationale, the methodological details and a practical example of the application of the enhanced SWOT analysis in the context of technological foresight. The authors take into account and propose an innovative extension of SWOT analysis by an additional dimension (expanding known in the literature SWOT analysis model that includes three criteria of factor division: occurrence in time, source of origin and nature of influence): the assessment of factor significance in two time perspectives: the current state and the hypothetical horizon. As a result, a thirty-two-field SWOT diagram is obtained. The paper also presents the practical implications of the proposed methodology by offering a case study.

References Powered by Scopus

How are foresight methods selected?

287Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kurt Lewin's field theory: A review and re-evaluation

207Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Designing for decision making

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The impact of european integration processes on the investment potential and institutional maturity of rural communities

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Circular economy in China: Translating principles into practice

63Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geosites and georesources to foster geotourism in communities: Case study of the santa elena peninsula geopark project in Ecuador

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nazarko, J., Ejdys, J., Halicka, K., Magruk, A., Nazarko, Ł., & Skorek, A. (2017). Application of Enhanced SWOT Analysis in the Future-oriented Public Management of Technology. In Procedia Engineering (Vol. 182, pp. 482–490). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.03.140

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 62

65%

Lecturer / Post doc 17

18%

Researcher 9

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 33

43%

Engineering 22

29%

Social Sciences 14

18%

Computer Science 8

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free