Appropriate food policies and investments could reduce child malnutrition by 43% in 2020

14Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This report describes past trends in global child malnutrition and assesses future prospects for reducing child malnutrition. Most developing countries have significantly reduced the proportion of malnourished children during the past three decades. However, because of population growth, the absolute number of malnourished children has fallen much less sharply. Moreover, the number of malnourished children has increased in Sub-Saharan Africa. A global food supply-and-demand model is used to project child malnutrition to 2020 under alternative assumptions on policies and investments that influence food security outcomes in education, clean water, agricultural research, irrigation and rural infrastructure. The baseline "best-estimate" projection shows that the number of malnourished children will continue to decline slowly but that child malnutrition will continue to increase in Sub-Saharan Africa. The optimistic scenario shows that better policy and more rapid economic and agricultural growth can lead to substantial food security improvements, but the pessimistic scenario shows that significantly worse outcomes are also possible with relatively small declines in policy and investment efforts relative to the baseline. A concerted effort to eliminate childhood malnutrition would require policy reform and significant increases in public investment to produce long-term gains in income growth, agricultural productivity and social indicators.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosegrant, M. W., & Meijer, S. (2002). Appropriate food policies and investments could reduce child malnutrition by 43% in 2020. In Journal of Nutrition (Vol. 132). American Institute of Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.11.3437s

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

53%

Researcher 6

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 6

46%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

23%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

15%

Arts and Humanities 2

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0