Racial disparities in cervical cancer survival over time

52Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The purpose of this study is to examine changes over time in survival for African American (AA) and white women diagnosed with cervical cancer (CC). METHODS Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data from 1985 to 2009 were used for this analysis. Racial differences in survival were evaluated between African American (AA) and white women. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards survival methods were used to assess differences in survival by race at 5-year intervals. RESULTS The study sample included 23,368 women, including 3886 (16.6%) who were AA and 19,482 (83.4%) who were white. AA women were older (51.4 versus 48.9 years; P

References Powered by Scopus

Cancer statistics, 2013

11925Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2005

5643Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths

3926Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Competing risk bias was common in Kaplan-Meier risk estimates published in prominent medical journals

102Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening and Outcomes

79Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Racial and ethnic disparities over time in the treatment and mortality of women with gynecological malignancies

71Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rauh-Hain, J. A., Clemmer, J. T., Bradford, L. S., Clark, R. M., Growdon, W. B., Goodman, A., … Del Carmen, M. G. (2013). Racial disparities in cervical cancer survival over time. Cancer, 119(20), 3644–3652. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28261

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

67%

Researcher 10

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 30

83%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

6%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 14

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0