Trusting others to ‘do the math’

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Researchers effectively trust the work of others anytime they use software tools or custom software. In this article I explore this notion of trusting others, using Digital Humanities as a focus, and drawing on my own experience. Software is inherently flawed and limited, so when its use in scholarship demands better practices and terminology, to review research software and describe development processes. It is also important to make research software engineers and their work more visible, both for the purposes of review and credit.

References Powered by Scopus

Efficient methods for topic model inference on streaming document collections

323Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Significant themes in 19th-century literature

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scientific publishing. A scientist's nightmare: software problem leads to five retractions.

114Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A trust framework for online research data services

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Missing Data, Speculative Reading

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Power asymmetries of ehumanities infrastructures

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koeser, R. S. (2016, June 7). Trusting others to ‘do the math.’ Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2016.1165454

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

67%

Researcher 2

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Arts and Humanities 4

36%

Computer Science 3

27%

Social Sciences 3

27%

Psychology 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free