Rapid, learning-induced inhibitory synaptogenesis in murine barrel field

66Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The structure of neurons changes during development and in response to injury or alteration in sensory experience. Changes occur in the number, shape, and dimensions of dendritic spines together with their synapses. However, precise data on these changes in response to learning are sparse. Here, we show using quantitative transmission electron microscopy that a simple form of learning involving mystacial vibrissae results in 70%increase in the density of inhibitory synapses on spines of neurons located in layer IV barrels that represent the stimulated vibrissae. The spines contain one asymmetrical (excitatory) and one symmetrical (inhibitory) synapse (double-synapse spines), and their density increases threefold as a result of learning with no apparent change in the density of asymmetrical synapses. This effect seems to be specific for learning because pseudoconditioning (in which the conditioned and unconditioned stimuli are delivered at random) does not lead to the enhancement of symmetrical synapses but instead results in an upregulation of asymmetrical synapses on spines. Symmetrical synapses of cells located in barrels receiving the conditioned stimulus also show a greater concentration of GABA in their presynaptic terminals. These results indicate that the immediate effect of classical conditioning in the "conditioned" barrels is rapid, pronounced, and inhibitory. Copyright © 2010 the authors.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jasinska, M., Siucinska, E., Cybulska-Klosowicz, A., Pyza, E., Furness, D. N., Kossut, M., & Glazewski, S. (2010). Rapid, learning-induced inhibitory synaptogenesis in murine barrel field. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(3), 1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2970-09.2010

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 30

49%

Researcher 19

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33

59%

Neuroscience 16

29%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

7%

Computer Science 3

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0