Philosophical Logic = Philosophy + Logic?

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

My purpose in this paper is to shed some light on two questions: In what sense is logic philosophical? And what is philosophical logic? I take these two questions as coextensive: An answer to one of them is also (or can easily be converted into) an answer to the other. I approach the problem from three perspectives: a conceptual, a descriptive, and a prescriptive perspective. In other words, I try to answer the following questions: (i) In what sense can logic be taken as philosophical? (ii) In what sense has logic been taken as philosophical? (iii) In what sense should logic be taken as philosophical? To this end, I analyze excerpts from five works in which meanings are attributed to the expression “philosophical logic.” The meanings are then object of critical analysis: I try to assess which of these semantical alternatives do not hold up as satisfactory answers to (iii). The result of this analysis is then used as a starting point for my own answer to question (iii).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silvestre, R. S. (2022). Philosophical Logic = Philosophy + Logic? In Studies in Universal Logic (pp. 281–301). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94452-0_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free