Optimal synthesis versus dynamic analysis for an acrobatic aerial movement

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A predictive method: the optimal synthesis, based on an optimal dynamic problem, was solved for generating the aerial phase of a backward somersault. Optimal joint torques were compared with those resulting from inverse dynamics. A gymnast was modeled as a planar seven-segment multibody system with six internal degrees of freedom. The aerial motion was generated using a parametric optimization technique. The performance criterion minimized the time integral of quadratic joint torques. Optimal synthesis has produced a somersault closely mimicking the experimental one. Optimal joint torques revealed the motor control at the knee after takeoff unattainable by inverse dynamics analysis because of the measurement uncertainty propagation. Moreover, our study suggests that minimization of joint torques might be the primary control objective of a backward somersault. © 2012 ACAPS, EDP Sciences.

References Powered by Scopus

Adjustments to zatsiorsky-seluyanov's segment inertia parameters

2314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On-line computational scheme for mechanical manipulators

1023Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic optimization of human walking

858Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Effect of three technical arms swings on the elevation of the center of mass during a standing back somersault

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kinetic and Kinematic Analysis of Landing during Standing Back Somersault Using Three Technical Arm Swings in Artistic Gymnastics

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leboeuf, F., Seguin, P., & Lacouture, P. (2012). Optimal synthesis versus dynamic analysis for an acrobatic aerial movement. Movement and Sports Sciences - Science et Motricite, 75(1), 19–25. https://doi.org/10.1051/sm/2011162

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

40%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

20%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free