Party Building as Institutional Bricolage: Asserting Authority at the Business Frontier

14Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is expanding its organizational infrastructure in the private sector, revealing the dynamics of CCP-style institutional change. Party building follows a distinct version of adaptive governance. Hesitant to rely on innovative tools alone, organizers productively tinker with traditional and disparate elements. Grassroots Party organs, sanctified by their venerable history, are redeployed - initially for modest purposes that fall short of their original revolutionary potential. The Party's surge in private-sector firms was triggered by technocrats overhauling Leninist systems to reconnect to Party members; the search for a broader mission came later. To empower CCP organs in companies, organizers use tactical precedents ranging from incentives to negotiations around Party financing, and membership discipline. Combining tactics from different eras, overseas Party building deploys old organizational arrangements to new ends, whereas digitization gives time-worn procedures a second life. The inclination for institutional bricolage is a deeply rooted hallmark of innovation in Chinese statecraft.

References Powered by Scopus

Red capitalists in China: The party, private entrepreneurs, and prospects for political change

589Citations
114Readers
Get full text
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

The Political Thought of Xi Jinping

12Citations
17Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koss, D. (2021). Party Building as Institutional Bricolage: Asserting Authority at the Business Frontier. China Quarterly, 248(1), 222–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741021000692

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Researcher 2

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 16

89%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Linguistics 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0