Effect of Reynolds Number on Laminar Mixing in an Annular Tube Combining Two Crossed Secondary Flows

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

To improve static and continuous mixers, several methods have been proposed in the literature. Herein, two well-known passive intensification configurations were applied to an annular laminar flow and numerically studied. Residence time distributions (RTDs) and Poincaré sections were examined to investigate the dispersion of the particles. These two approaches show that geometric perturbations of the walls improve the mixing level for all Reynolds numbers investigated. Above Re = 300, the increase in mixing can be attributed to chaotic advection within the flow. Finally, a general reactor model that allows the RTD in the annular tube to be predicted with high confidence is proposed.

References Powered by Scopus

Stirring by chaotic advection

1635Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Static mixers in the process industries - a review

500Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The development of chaotic advection

407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Residence Time Distribution of a Capillary Microreactor Used for Pharmaceutical Synthesis

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of annulus ratio on the residence time distribution and Péclet number in micro/milli-scale reactors

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Experimental and numerical investigation on the influence of wall deformations on mixing quality of a Multifunctional Heat Exchanger/Reactor (MHER)

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bouvier, P., André, C., & Russeil, S. (2019). Effect of Reynolds Number on Laminar Mixing in an Annular Tube Combining Two Crossed Secondary Flows. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 42(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201800134

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

56%

Energy 2

22%

Chemical Engineering 2

22%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free