Bruggeman formalism versus “Bruggeman formalism”: particulate composite materials comprising oriented ellipsoidal particles

  • Mackay T
23Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two different formalisms for the homogenization of composite materials containing oriented ellipsoidal particles of isotropic dielectric materials are being named after Bruggeman. Numerical studies reveal clear differences between the two formalisms which may be exacerbated: (i) if the component particles become more aspherical, (ii) at mid-range values of the volume fractions, and (iii) if the homogenized component material is dissipative. The correct Bruggeman formalism uses the correct polarizability density dyadics of the component particles, but the other formalism does not.

References Powered by Scopus

Berechnung verschiedener physikalischer Konstanten von heterogenen Substanzen. I. Dielektrizitätskonstanten und Leitfähigkeiten der Mischkörper aus isotropen Substanzen

5954Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Variational approach to the theory of the effective magnetic permeability of multiphase materials

2757Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Epsilon-near-zero metamaterials and electromagnetic sources: Tailoring the radiation phase pattern

1008Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Electromagnetic Surface Waves: A Modern Perspective

299Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anisotropic Bruggeman effective medium approaches for slanted columnar thin films

83Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Plasmonic sensing using metallic nano-sculptured thin films

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mackay, T. G. (2012). Bruggeman formalism versus “Bruggeman formalism”: particulate composite materials comprising oriented ellipsoidal particles. Journal of Nanophotonics, 6(1), 069501. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jnp.6.069501

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 5

38%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 10

67%

Engineering 3

20%

Computer Science 1

7%

Mathematics 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free