Nonsubjective Assessment of Shape, Volume and Symmetry during Breast Augmentation with Handheld 3D Device

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Three-dimensional Surface Imaging (3DSI) has become a valuable tool for planning and documenting surgical procedures. Although surface scanners have allowed for a better understanding of breast shape, size, and asymmetry during patient consultation, its use has not been included in intraoperative assessment so far. Validation of the reliability of the intraoperative use of a portable handheld 3DSI equipment as a tool to evaluate morphological changes during breast augmentation surgery. The patients who underwent bilateral subpectoral breast augmentation through an inframammary incision were included in this study. Intraoperative 3DSI was performed with the Artec Eva device, allowing for visualization of the surgical area before incision, after use of breast sizers and implant, and after wound closure. Intraoperatively manual measurements of breast distances and volume changes due to known sizer and implant volumes were in comparison with digital measurements calculated from 3DSI of the surgical area. Bilateral breasts of 40 patients were 3D photographed before incision and after suture successfully. A further 108 implant sizer uses were digitally documented. There was no significant difference between manual tape measurement and digital breast distance measurement. Pre- to postoperative 3D volume change showed no significant difference to the known sizer and implant volume.

References Powered by Scopus

Anthropometric precision and accuracy of digital three-dimensional photogrammetry: Comparing the genex and 3dMD imaging systems with one another and with direct anthropometry

285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cyclic changes in composition and volume of the breast during the menstrual cycle, measured by magnetic resonance imaging

135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Error assessment of subjective estimates of linear breast dimensions versus the objective method

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Z., Schenck, T. L., Giunta, R. E., Etzel, L., & Koban, K. C. (2022). Nonsubjective Assessment of Shape, Volume and Symmetry during Breast Augmentation with Handheld 3D Device. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11144002

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Researcher 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

71%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free