Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas

20Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Grafting with vigorous rootstocks could offer tomato growers in Texas sustainable and efficient option to achieve reliable yield across a range of production systems and locations. Genotypes (G) of grafted and non-grafted tomato were grown in different environments (E) in the 2017 and 2018 spring seasons. The objectives of the study were to (i) evaluate the effects of production system and grafting on tomato yield traits, (ii) determine the size of genotypic and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) variance components, and (iii) evaluate the relative stability of tested genotypes for yield and its components across production environments. In 2017, genotypes were non-grafted ‘TAMU Hot Ty’ (TAM) and ‘Tycoon’ (TY) and each grafted on commercial tomato rootstocks ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, TY/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, TY/MU) while in 2018, TAM and ‘HM1823’ (HM) were grafted on ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, HM/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, HM/MU). Testing environments were high tunnel (HT) and open-field (OF) in Uvalde in 2017 while in 2018, these were HT and OF in Lubbock (LU-HT, LU-OF), Overton (OV-HT, OV-OF), Uvalde (UV-HT, UV-OF), and Weslaco (WE-HT, WE-OF). Total and marketable yields, fruit number per plant, and average fruit weight were significantly affected by E, G, and G × E interaction. Environmental component contributed 71–86% to the total variation for all these traits, while genotype explained 1.5–10.8%, and the contribution of G × E ranged between 4.3 to 6.7%. Estimation of the univariate statistic parameters and genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) biplot analysis indicated that HM/MU and HM/ES were the most stable graft combination with the highest total and marketable yields, while TAM/ES was very unstable for yields across test environments. TAM/MU was stable but with yield lower than the grand mean. These results suggest that high tomato yields could be consistently achieved with grafted combination (HM/MU and HM/ES) especially under high tunnel production system across the regions of Texas.

References Powered by Scopus

Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: Principles and applications

1018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario

755Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress

274Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Breeding for higher yield, early maturity, wider adaptability and waterlogging tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L.): A case study

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Grafting for managing vegetable crop pests

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Mapping Quantitative Trait Loci Associated With Graft (In)Compatibility in Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.)

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Djidonou, D., Leskovar, D. I., Joshi, M., Jifon, J., Avila, C. A., Masabni, J., … Crosby, K. (2020). Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas. Scientific Reports, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70548-3

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Researcher 2

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

76%

Environmental Science 2

12%

Mathematics 1

6%

Arts and Humanities 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0