Why Can the Brain (and Not a Computer) Make Sense of the Liar Paradox?

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Ordinary computing machines prohibit self-reference because it leads to logical inconsistencies and undecidability. In contrast, the human mind can understand self-referential statements without necessitating physically impossible brain states. Why can the brain make sense of self-reference? Here, we address this question by defining the Strange Loop Model, which features causal feedback between two brain modules, and circumvents the paradoxes of self-reference and negation by unfolding the inconsistency in time. We also argue that the metastable dynamics of the brain inhibit and terminate unhalting inferences. Finally, we show that the representation of logical inconsistencies in the Strange Loop Model leads to causal incongruence between brain subsystems in Integrated Information Theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fraser, P., Solé, R., & De las Cuevas, G. (2021). Why Can the Brain (and Not a Computer) Make Sense of the Liar Paradox? Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.802300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free