Physical Confounding Factors Affecting Gas Sensors Response: A Review on Effects and Compensation Strategies for Electronic Nose Applications

25Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Electronic noses (e-noses) are devices based on combining different gas sensors’ responses to a given sample for identifying specific odor fingerprints. In recent years, this technology has been considered a promising novel tool in several fields of application, but several issues still hamper its widespread use. This review paper describes how some physical confounding factors, such as temperature, humidity, and gas flow, in terms of flow direction and flow rate, can drastically influence gas sensors’ responses and, consequently, e-nose results. Among the software and hardware approaches adopted to address such issues, different hardware compensation strategies proposed in the literature were critically analyzed. Solutions related to e-nose sensors’ modification, design and readout, sampling system and/or chamber geometry design were investigated. A trade-off between the loss of volatile compounds of interest, the decrease of sensors’ sensitivity, and the lack of fast responses need to be pointed out. The existing body of knowledge suggests that the e-nose design needs to be highly tailored to the target application to exploit the technology potentialities fully and highlights the need for further studies comparing the several solutions proposed as a starting point for the application-driven design of e-nose-based systems.

References Powered by Scopus

Metal oxide gas sensors: Sensitivity and influencing factors

2402Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semiconductor metal oxide gas sensors: A review

1776Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gas sensors based on conducting polymers

1361Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Wearable Nano-Based Gas Sensors for Environmental Monitoring and Encountered Challenges in Optimization

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Chemiresistive gas sensors beyond metal oxides: Using ultrathin two-dimensional nanomaterials

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent Advances and Future Perspectives in the E-Nose Technologies Addressed to the Wine Industry

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robbiani, S., Lotesoriere, B. J., Dellacà, R. L., & Capelli, L. (2023, October 1). Physical Confounding Factors Affecting Gas Sensors Response: A Review on Effects and Compensation Strategies for Electronic Nose Applications. Chemosensors. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors11100514

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

17%

Researcher 2

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

45%

Materials Science 3

27%

Chemical Engineering 2

18%

Computer Science 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free