Bayesian deep learning on a quantum computer

43Citations
Citations of this article
217Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Bayesian methods in machine learning, such as Gaussian processes, have great advantages compared to other techniques. In particular, they provide estimates of the uncertainty associated with a prediction. Extending the Bayesian approach to deep architectures has remained a major challenge. Recent results connected deep feedforward neural networks with Gaussian processes, allowing training without backpropagation. This connection enables us to leverage a quantum algorithm designed for Gaussian processes and develop a new algorithm for Bayesian deep learning on quantum computers. The properties of the kernel matrix in the Gaussian process ensure the efficient execution of the core component of the protocol, quantum matrix inversion, providing at least a polynomial speedup over classical algorithms. Furthermore, we demonstrate the execution of the algorithm on contemporary quantum computers and analyze its robustness with respect to realistic noise models.

References Powered by Scopus

Quantum machine learning

2691Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Universal quantum simulators

2061Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations

2038Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology

143Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Machine Learning: Quantum vs Classical

121Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications of artificial intelligence in engineering and manufacturing: a systematic review

119Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhao, Z., Pozas-Kerstjens, A., Rebentrost, P., & Wittek, P. (2019). Bayesian deep learning on a quantum computer. Quantum Machine Intelligence, 1(1–2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42484-019-00004-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 80

59%

Researcher 38

28%

Professor / Associate Prof. 11

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 64

47%

Computer Science 50

37%

Engineering 11

8%

Mathematics 10

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free