Complementary and alternative medicine: Gender and marginality

13Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is widely recognized by social scientists that over recent decades the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has increased in the West, and that both users and practitioners are more likely to be women. Despite this, relatively little attention has been paid to explaining the relationship between gender and CAM, an omission this chapter seeks to address. In doing so, we will explore the apparent affinity between CAM, women’s health concerns and feminist agendas, and the extent to which CAM has the potential to create spaces for gender-sensitive healthcare. However, in practice this radical potential has been limited by the persistence of gendered power relations embedded within biomedicine, coupled with the position of ‘mainstream marginality’ (Cant, 2009) that CAM inhabits.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cant, S., & Watts, P. (2012). Complementary and alternative medicine: Gender and marginality. In The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare, Second Edition (pp. 488–504). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free