Does a waiting room video about what to expect during an emergency department visit improve patient satisfaction?

41Citations
Citations of this article
135Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: We created an instructional waiting room video that explained what patients should expect during their emergency department (ED) visit and sought to determine whether preparing patients using this video would 1) improve satisfaction, 2) decrease perceived waiting room times and 3) increase calls to an outpatient referral line in an ambulatory population. Methods: This serial cross-sectional study took place over a period of 2 months before (control) and 2 months after the introduction of an educational waiting room video that described a typical patient visit to our ED. We enrolled a convenience sample of adult patients or parents of pediatric patients who were triaged to the ED waiting room; a research assistant distributed and collected the surveys as patients were being discharged after treatment. Subjects were excluded if they were admitted. The primary outcome was overall satisfaction measured on a 5-point Likert scale, and secondary outcomes included perceived waiting room time, and the number of outpatient referral-line calls. Results: There were 1132 subjects surveyed: 551 prevideo and 581 postvideo. The mean age was 38 years (standard deviation [SD] 18), 61% were female and the mean ED length of stay was 5.9 hours (SD 3.6). Satisfaction scores were significantly higher postvideo, with 65% of participants ranking their visit as either "excellent" or "very good," compared with 58.1% in the prevideo group (p= 0.019); however, perceived waiting room time was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.24). Patient calls to our specialty outpatient clinic referral line increased from 1.5 per month (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-2.42) to 4.5 per month (95% CI 1.19-7.18) (p = 0.032). After adjusting for possible covariates, the most significant determinants of overall satisfaction were perceived waiting room time (odds ratio [OR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.48) and having seen the ED waiting room video (OR 1.41, 95% CI 1.06-1.86). Conclusion: Preparing patients for their ED experience by describing the ED process of care through a waiting room video can improve ED patient satisfaction and the knowledge of outpatient clinic resources in an ambulatory population. Future studies should research the implementation of this educational intervention in a randomized fashion.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of actual waiting time, perceived waiting time, information delivery, and expressive quality on patient satisfaction in the emergency department

417Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient satisfaction investigations and the emergency department: What does the literature say?

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Internal medicine patients' expectations for care during office visits

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Twenty years of patient satisfaction research applied to the emergency department: A qualitative review

152Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alleviating anxiety in patients prior to MRI: A pilot single-centre single-blinded randomised controlled trial to compare video demonstration or telephone conversation with a radiographer versus routine intervention

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Papa, L., Seaberg, D. C., Rees, E., Ferguson, K., Stair, R., Goldfeder, B., & Meurer, D. (2008). Does a waiting room video about what to expect during an emergency department visit improve patient satisfaction? Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 10(4), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1481803500010356

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 55

65%

Researcher 15

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 12

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 49

60%

Nursing and Health Professions 15

18%

Social Sciences 10

12%

Psychology 8

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free