A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity

14.3kCitations
Citations of this article
4.1kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Regression methods were used to select and score 12 items from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) to reproduce the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scales in the general US population (n = 2,333). The resulting 12-item short-form (SF-12) achieved multiple R squares of 0.911 and 0.918 in predictions of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and SF-36 Mental Component Summary scores, respectively. Scoring algorithms from the general population used to score 12-item versions of the two components (Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary) achieved R squares of 0.905 with the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and 0.938 with the SF-36 Mental Component Summary when cross-validated in the Medical Outcomes Study Test-retest (2-week) correlations of 0.89 and 0.76 were observed for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, respectively, in the general US population (n = 232). Twenty cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of empirical validity previously published for the 36-item short-form scales and summary measures were replicated for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, including comparisons between patient groups known to differ or to change in terms of the presence and seriousness of physical and mental conditions, acute symptoms, age and aging, self-reported 1-year changes in health, and recovery from depression. In 14 validity tests involving physical criteria, relative validity estimates for the 12-item Physical Component Summary ranged from 0.43 to 0.93 (median = 0.67) in comparison with the best 36-item short-form scale. Relative validity estimates for the 12-item Mental Component Summary in 6 tests involving mental criteria ranged from 0.60 to 1.07 (median = 0.97) in relation to the best 36-item short-form scale. Average scores for the 2 summary measures, and those for most scales in the 8-scale profile based on the 12-item short-form, closely mirrored those for the 36-item short-form, although standard errors were nearly always larger for the 12-item short-form.

References Powered by Scopus

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs

5643Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcome measure for primary care

3787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional Status and Well-being of Patients With Chronic Conditions: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study

2043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment

5479Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring Health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires

3850Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement-based care in STAR*D: Implications for clinical practice

3338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: Construction of Scales and Preliminary Tests of Reliability and Validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1480

59%

Researcher 636

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 293

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 112

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1087

50%

Psychology 521

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 337

15%

Social Sciences 235

11%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 19
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 26

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free