Relationship of Trout Growth to Frequent Electrofishing and Diet Collection in a Headwater Stream

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research on fishes sometimes requires that individual fish be captured and subjected to invasive procedures multiple times over a relatively short time span. Electrofishing is one of the most common techniques used to capture fish, and it is known to cause injury to fish under certain circumstances. We evaluated the relationship of growth rates in Columbia River Redband Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri to the number of times that they were captured via electrofishing and gastrically lavaged during the summer of 2018 in a mountainous, headwater stream. We captured fish between two and seven times over the course of 86 d using continuous (smooth) DC backpack electrofishing. We observed no relationship between the growth rate of Columbia River Redband Trout and the number of times that they were captured or gastrically lavaged. Although these findings contrast with hatchery electrofishing experiments, they may represent the greater resiliency of wild fish. It appears that researchers can use electrofishing and gastric lavage in cold waters at least once per month, and potentially up to twice per month, without greatly affecting the growth of wild Columbia River Redband Trout.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clancy, N. G., Dunnigan, J. L., & Budy, P. (2022). Relationship of Trout Growth to Frequent Electrofishing and Diet Collection in a Headwater Stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 42(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/nafm.10728

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free