Development of a Reproducible Prognostic Gene Signature to Predict the Clinical Outcome in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Alongside various clinical prognostic factors for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) such as the international prognostic index (IPI) components (ie, age, tumor stage, performance status, serum lactate dehydrogenase concentration, and number of extranodal sites), prognostic gene signatures have recently shown promising efficacy. However, previously developed signatures for DLBCL suffer from many major inadequacies such as lack of reproducibility in external datasets, high number of members (genes) in a signature, and inconsistent association with the survival time in various datasets. Accordingly, we sought to find a reproducible prognostic gene signature with a minimal number of genes. Seven datasets—namely GSE10856 (420 samples), GSE31312 (470 samples), GSE69051 (157 samples), GSE32918 (172 samples), GSE4475 (123 samples), GSE11318 (203 samples), and GSE34171 (91 samples)—were employed. The datasets were randomly categorized into training (1219 samples comprising GSE10856, GSE31312, GSE69051, and GSE32918) and validation (417 samples consisting of GSE4475, GSE11318, and GSE34171) groups. Through the univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, common genes associated with the overall survival time with a P value less than 0.001 and a false discovery rate less than 5% were identified in 1219 patients included in the 4 training datasets. Thereafter, the common genes were entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis encompassing the common genes and the international prognostic index (IPI) factors as covariates, and then only common genes with a significant level of difference (P < 0.01 and z-score >2 or < 0.0001). Subsequently, this signature was tested in 3 validation datasets. Our signature was able to strongly predict clinical outcomes in the validation datasets (Ps < 0.0001). In the multivariate Cox analysis, our outcome predictor was independent of the routine IPI components in both training datasets (Ps < 0.0001). Furthermore, our outcome predictor was the most powerful independent prognostic variable (Ps < 0.0001). We developed a potential reproducible prognostic gene signature which was able to robustly discriminate low-risk patients with DLBCL from high-risk ones.

References Powered by Scopus

Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling

8559Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma

3401Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning

2146Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Identification and Validation of a Prognostic Gene Signature for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Based on Tumor Microenvironment-Related Genes

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of an RNA sequencing-based prognostic gene signature in multiple myeloma

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genetic and transcriptomic analyses of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with poor outcomes within two years of diagnosis

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zamani-Ahmadmahmudi, M., & Nassiri, S. M. (2019). Development of a Reproducible Prognostic Gene Signature to Predict the Clinical Outcome in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48721-0

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 2

33%

Computer Science 1

17%

Sports and Recreations 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0