A natural evolution strategy for multi-objective optimization

13Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The recently introduced family of natural evolution strategies (NES), a novel stochastic descent method employing the natural gradient, is providing a more principled alternative to the well-known covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). Until now, NES could only be used for single-objective optimization. This paper extends the approach to the multi-objective case, by first deriving a (1 + 1) hillclimber version of NES which is then used as the core component of a multi-objective optimization algorithm. We empirically evaluate the approach on a battery of benchmark functions and find it to be competitive with the state-of-the-art. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II

41051Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies.

3466Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search

2104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Global convergence of the (1 + 1) evolution strategy to a critical point

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization for Pedestrian Route Guidance with Multiple Scenarios

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sparse Black-Box Inversion Attack with Limited Information

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Glasmachers, T., Schaul, T., & Schmidhuber, J. (2010). A natural evolution strategy for multi-objective optimization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6238 LNCS, pp. 627–636). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15844-5_63

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

67%

Researcher 6

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 26

63%

Engineering 12

29%

Mathematics 2

5%

Neuroscience 1

2%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0