Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

11.1kCitations
Citations of this article
9.0kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There is an urgent need to improve the infrastructure supporting the reuse of scholarly data. A diverse set of stakeholders-representing academia, industry, funding agencies, and scholarly publishers-have come together to design and jointly endorse a concise and measureable set of principles that we refer to as the FAIR Data Principles. The intent is that these may act as a guideline for those wishing to enhance the reusability of their data holdings. Distinct from peer initiatives that focus on the human scholar, the FAIR Principles put specific emphasis on enhancing the ability of machines to automatically find and use the data, in addition to supporting its reuse by individuals. This Comment is the first formal publication of the FAIR Principles, and includes the rationale behind them, and some exemplar implementations in the community.

References Powered by Scopus

The Protein Data Bank

33180Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

UniProt: A hub for protein information

4124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

GenBank

2784Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews

7295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The arrive guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

3987Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Pfam protein families database in 2019

3416Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., … Mons, B. (2016). Comment: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25045090013501800

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2723

53%

Researcher 1661

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 584

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 169

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 842

32%

Computer Science 775

29%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 589

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 457

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 97
News Mentions: 264
References: 29
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 190

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0