ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions

13.3kCitations
Citations of this article
7.2kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Non-randomised studies of the effects of interventions are critical to many areas of healthcare evaluation, but their results may be biased. It is therefore important to understand and appraise their strengths and weaknesses. We developed ROBINS-I ("Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions"), a new tool for evaluating risk of bias in estimates of the comparative effectiveness (harm or benefit) of interventions from studies that did not use randomisation to allocate units (individuals or clusters of individuals) to comparison groups. The tool will be particularly useful to those undertaking systematic reviews that include non-randomised studies.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sterne, J. A., Hernán, M. A., Reeves, B. C., Savović, J., Berkman, N. D., Viswanathan, M., … Higgins, J. P. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ (Online), 355. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25035070010501400

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2206

67%

Researcher 692

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 230

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 167

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2081

70%

Nursing and Health Professions 493

17%

Psychology 219

7%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 159

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 5
News Mentions: 23
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 213

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0