Poverty and Welfare measurement on the basis of prospect theory

16Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper examines the measurement of social welfare, poverty, and inequality, taking into account features that have been found to be important welfare determinants in behavioral economics. Most notably, we incorporate reference-dependence, loss aversion, and diminishing sensitivity-aspects emphasized in Prospect Theory-to social welfare measurement. We suggest a new notion of equivalent income, the income level with which the individual would be as well off, evaluated using a standard concave utility function, as he actually is, evaluated with a reference-dependent utility function. We examine the differences between standard poverty and inequality measures based on observed income and measures that are calculated based on equivalent income. These differences are illustrated using household-level panel data from Russia and Vietnam. © 2014 UNU-WIDER. Review of Income and Wealth published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association for Research in Income and Wealth.

References Powered by Scopus

Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

10079Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the measurement of inequality

3314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles

1880Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Income mobility

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Poverty, aspirations, and the economics of hope

103Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Prospect theory and energy efficiency

64Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jäntti, M., Kanbur, R., Nyyssölä, M., & Pirttilä, J. (2014). Poverty and Welfare measurement on the basis of prospect theory. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12095

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 42

68%

Researcher 9

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

11%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 36

60%

Social Sciences 14

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free