The brachyherapy with low dose-rate iridium for prostate cancer

Abstract

(Purpose) Brachytherapy as an option for the treatment of prostate cancer has been commonly performed in USA. As the permanent seeding of the radioactive materials is strictly restricted by the law in Japan, brachytherapy must be performed by the temporary implant. This treatment has been performed at a few facilities in Japan mostly using high dose-rate iridium. Only our facility has been using low dose-rate iridium (LDR-Ir) for prostate cancer. This study evaluates the clinical resuits of the treatment. (Patients and Methods) Since December 1997 to December 1999,26 patients with histologically diagnosed as prostate cancer (Stage B, 92%; Stage C, 8%) underwent brachytherapy. Twenty-two patients received brachytherapy alone, three were treated with a combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy (ERT) and one was treated with a combination of brachytherapy and neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. Patients ranged in age from 61 to 84 (median 76) years old. Treatment was initiated with perineal needle placement. From 10 to 14 needles were placed through the holes on the template which was fixed to the stabilizer of the transrectal ultrasound probe. After the needle placement, CT scan was performed to draw distribution curves for the treatment planning. LDR-Ir wires were introduced to the sheath and indwelled during the time calculated from dosimetry. Peripheral dose was 70 Gy for the monotherapy of brachytherapy. For the combination therapy, 40 Gy was given by brachytherapy and 36 Gy with ERT afterwards. LDR-Ir wires were removed after completion of the radiation and patients were followed with serum PSA level and annual biopsy. (Results) During 2 to 26 (median 12) months follow-up, 8 out of 9 patients with initial PSA level above 20 ng/ml showed PSA failure. All 13 patients with initial PSA level lower than 20 ng/ml were free from PSA failure. Eight out of 11 patients with Gleason's score 7 or higher showed PSA failure, and all 14 patients (including three patients with combined therapy) with Gleason's score 6 or less were free from PSA failure. Annual biopsy was performed in 8 patients, and 4 patients histologically revealed tumor free and 4 patients (two of them showed PSA failure) were tumor positive. No major complication was observed, however, some minor side-effect as irritability was seen in 65%of the patients. (Conclusions) The results showed that brachytherapy with LDR-Ir was an acceptable treatment as long as the patients were selected strictly with PSA level and Gleason's score. A good candidate for this treatment is the patient whose PSA level is lower than 20 ng/ml and Gleason's score is 6 or less. The treatment is effective and safe, but further observation is necessary to reach the conclusion.