Reconciling sibling rivalry in the AACR 2 "family": The potential for agreement on rules for archival description of all types of materials

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Archivists and others faced with the cataloging of special materials have been searching for ways to resolve existing conflicts among a number of special descriptive cataloging manuals that have been prepared to clarify or expand upon rules presented in the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules 2nd edition (AACR 2). The author discusses the problems, issues, and conflicts that surfaced when cataloging rules in AACR 2 and the special manuals were compared with each other and with the 5XX fields (the "containers" available for notes) in the USMARC format. Three manuals used widely by archivists in their own repositories and in bibliographic networks that include archival materials receive special attention: Archives, Personal Papers, and Manuscripts; Graphic Materials; and Archival Moving Image Materials.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Processing and Cataloging of Archival Photograph Collections

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Discovering common missions or diverging goals: The state of archival descriptive standards in Canada and the United States

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matters, M. (1990). Reconciling sibling rivalry in the AACR 2 “family”: The potential for agreement on rules for archival description of all types of materials. American Archivist, 53(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.53.1.8w42105p006u255q

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Computer Science 2

29%

Arts and Humanities 2

29%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free