Large Gatherings? No, Thank You. Devaluation of Crowded Social Scenes During the COVID-19 Pandemic

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In most European countries, the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (spring 2020) led to the imposition of physical distancing rules, resulting in a drastic and sudden reduction of real-life social interactions. Even people not directly affected by the virus itself were impacted in their physical and/or mental health, as well as in their financial security, by governmental lockdown measures. We investigated whether the combination of these events had changed people's appraisal of social scenes by testing 241 participants recruited mainly in Italy, Austria, and Germany in an online, preregistered study conducted about 50 days after the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak in Europe. Images depicting individuals alone, in small groups (up to four people), and in large groups (more than seven people) were rated in terms of valence, arousal, and perceived physical distance. Pre-pandemic normative ratings were obtained from a validated database (OASIS). Several self-report measures were also taken, and condensed into four factors through factor analysis. All images were rated as more arousing compared to the pre-pandemic period, and the greater the decrease in real-life physical interactions reported by participants, the higher the ratings of arousal. As expected, only images depicting large gatherings of people were rated less positively during, compared to before, the pandemic. These ratings of valence were, however, moderated by a factor that included participants' number of days in isolation, relationship closeness, and perceived COVID-19 threat. Higher scores on this factor were associated with more positive ratings of images of individuals alone and in small groups, suggesting an increased appreciation of safer social situations, such as intimate and small-group contacts. The same factor was inversely related to the perceived physical distance between individuals in images of small and large groups, suggesting an impact of lockdown measures and contagion-related worries on the representation of interpersonal space. These findings point to rapid and compelling psychological and social consequences of the lockdown measures imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic on the perception of social groups. Further studies should assess the long-term impact of such events as typical everyday life is restored.

References Powered by Scopus

Development and Validation of Brief Measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales

30284Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation

14750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Stress, Social Support, and the Buffering Hypothesis

11770Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How culturally unique are pandemic effects? Evaluating cultural similarities and differences in effects of age, biological sex, and political beliefs on COVID impacts

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Personal space increases during the COVID-19 pandemic in response to real and virtual humans

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The space between us: The effect of perceived threat on discomfort distance and perceived pleasantness of interpersonal vicarious touch

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Massaccesi, C., Chiappini, E., Paracampo, R., & Korb, S. (2021). Large Gatherings? No, Thank You. Devaluation of Crowded Social Scenes During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.689162

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

56%

Researcher 5

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

27%

Psychology 3

27%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 38

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free