Kras mutant status, p16 and catenin expression may predict local recurrence in patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery (tems) for stage i rectal cancer

5Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Aim: Transanal endoscopic micro-surgery (TEMS) is emerging as an alternative treatment for rectal cancer Stage I. There remains a risk of local recurrence. The Aim of the study was to study the effect of biomarkers in local recurrence for Stage I rectal cancer following TEMS plus or minus radiotherapy. Materials and Methods: This is a case control study where we compared 10 early rectal cancers that had recurred, against 19 cases with no recurrence, total 29 patients (age=28.25-86.87, mean age=67.92 years, SD=14.91, Male, N=18, Female, N=11). All patients underwent TEMS for radiological Stage I rectal cancer (yT1N0M0 or yT2N0M0) established with combination of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and endorectal ultrasound. We prospectively collected all data on tumour histology, morphological features, as well as follow-up parameters. Molecular analysis was performed to identify their status on BRAF, KRAS, p16 O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and catenin. Results: Out of 29 specimens analyzed, 19 were KRAS wild type (65.9%) and 10 mutant (34.5%). Recurrence of the tumour was noted in 10 cases (34.5%) from which 60% were pT1 (N=6) and 40% pT2 (N=4). There was a statistically significant association between KRAS mutant status and local recurrence (N=6, p=0.037). P16 expression greater than 5% (mean=10.8%, min=0, max=95) is linked with earlier recurrence within 11.70 months (N=7, p=0.004). Membranous catenin expression (N=12, 48%) was also related with KRAS mutant status (p=0.006) but not with survival (p>0.05). BRAF gene was found to be wild type in all cases tested (N=23). Conclusion: KRAS/p16/catenin could be used as a combined biomarker for prediction of local recurrence and stratification of the risk for further surgery.

References Powered by Scopus

Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: Results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial

1037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling contributes to insensitivity of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to RAF inhibition with vemurafenib

865Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CpG island methylator phenotype, microsatellite instability, BRAF mutation and clinical outcome in colon cancer

681Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of KRAS in endometrial cancer: A mini-review

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Kras mutant status may be associated with distant recurrence in early-stage rectal cancer

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Genetics of rectal cancer and novel therapies: primer for radiologists

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sideris, M., Moorhead, J., Diaz-Cano, S., Bjarnason, I., Haji, A., & Papagrigoriadis, S. (2016). Kras mutant status, p16 and catenin expression may predict local recurrence in patients who underwent transanal endoscopic microsurgery (tems) for stage i rectal cancer. Anticancer Research, 36(10), 5315–5324. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.11104

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

71%

Researcher 3

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

79%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

5%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free