Areas of endemism: An improved optimality criterion

218Citations
Citations of this article
412Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The grid-based method to identify areas of endemism proposed by Szumik et al. (Syst. Biol. 51:806-816, 2002) is extended. The improvements include the ability to assign scores of endemicity to sets of disjoint areas, and to have each species contribute more to the score of endemicity of an area, or less, according to how well its distribution matches the area. The modified method also allows for partially overlapping areas; an area partially overlapping with another one of higher score is retained when the set of lower score has a minimum proportion of species endemic to it. Algorithms to evaluate areas of endemism under this criterion are discussed, and implemented in a computer program (NDM; available at www.zmuc.dk/public/phylogeny). The new algorithms allow evaluation of much larger data sets. [Biogeography; distribution patterns; endemism.].

References Powered by Scopus

On the identification of areas of endemism

403Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An optimality criterion to determine areas of endemism

210Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Area and endemism

200Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions

583Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Phylogenetic endemism: A new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history

376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Applications of ecological niche modeling for species delimitation: A review and empirical evaluation using day geckos (Phelsuma) from Madagascar

374Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szumik, C. A., & Goloboff, P. A. (2004). Areas of endemism: An improved optimality criterion. Systematic Biology, 53(6), 968–977. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490888859

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25020406080

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 175

58%

Researcher 76

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 46

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

1%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 284

83%

Environmental Science 30

9%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 19

6%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 9

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0