Spatial modeling of forest stand susceptibility to logging operations

24Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The susceptibility of residual, non-harvested, live trees to damage caused by the harvesting of other nearby trees has received moderate attention over the last four decades through observational studies prompted by concerns over ecological and economic consequences of logging operations. We developed models to predict the potential level of damage to residual trees that could be caused by selective timber harvesting. Three machine-learning methods, i.e., classification and regression tree (CART), random forest (RF), and boosted regression tree (BRT), were assessed for this purpose. Through an observational study of a harvested area in the Hyrcanian forests of Iran, we recorded damage to trees >7.5 cm diameter at breast height along transects and grouped them into three types: (1) scars >100 cm2, (2) >50% crown removal, and (3) trees leaning >10°. These field observations were associated with the spatially explicit characteristics of the forest stand, i.e., slope angle, slope aspect, altitude, slope length, topographic position index, stand type, stand density, and distance from the nearest roads and skid trails, that were considered as the explanatory variables to the modeling processes. To determine whether the CART, RF, and BRT models performed well in estimating the probability of damage occurrence, they were validated using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUC) curve. The results revealed that the BRT model with AIC = −276 and AUC = 0.89 generated the most accurate spatially explicit distribution map of stand susceptibility to damage from logging operations, followed by RF (AIC = −263 and AUC = 0.87) and CART (AIC = −23 and AUC = 0.62). We found that the spatial extent of residual stand damage was highly influenced by slope terrain and stand density. Our study has practical implications for reorganizing and planning reduced-impact logging operations and provides forest engineers with insights into the utility of machine learning methods in domains of forestry and forest engineering.

References Powered by Scopus

Random forests

95789Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine

20109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An introduction to ROC analysis

16134Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Analysis of land use and land cover change using time-series data and random forest in north korea

43Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forest fire susceptibility assessment using google earth engine in Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quadratic Discriminant Analysis Based Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Groundwater Potential Modeling and Mapping

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shabani, S., Jaafari, A., & Bettinger, P. (2021). Spatial modeling of forest stand susceptibility to logging operations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106601

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 4

31%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

33%

Environmental Science 4

33%

Engineering 3

25%

Computer Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0