Imaging in genitourinary cancer from the urologists' perspective

10Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is well established that advances in imaging may lead to early cancer detection, more accurate tumour staging and consequently adequate treatment, better monitoring of the disease and enhanced surveillance for recurrences after treatment. This manuscript reviews the current use of imaging in genitourinary cancer and explores the impact of imaging findings in clinical management. Additionally, an effort has been made to present the emerging imaging modalities and also their possible role in diagnosis and treatment of these cancers. © 2007 International Cancer Imaging Society.

References Powered by Scopus

Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer

1827Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer: A multi- institutional update

1772Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States

1384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology

289Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of retroperitoneal spread of testicular cancer: A literature review

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Molecular Imaging of Reporter Gene Expression in Prostate Cancer: An Overview

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsakiris, P., & de la Rosette, J. (2007). Imaging in genitourinary cancer from the urologists’ perspective. Cancer Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2007.0009

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

37%

Researcher 5

26%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

16%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 13

72%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

17%

Computer Science 1

6%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free